FOUR POINTS NO 3

I trace the edges of “Four Points Nos 1 - 2 - 3,” where power, direction, and consequence collide. Each plane cuts through the canvas like the forces that shape our world—political, economic, environmental, and social. These four points define the boundaries of our existence, yet they shift and fracture under the weight of manipulation and unrest.

Four Points No. 1 is bold, sharp, decisive. The world is divided into blocks of influence—leaders claiming certainty, politicians crafting illusions of stability. But beneath the surface, truth bends. Power is no longer rooted in governance but in control—of minds, of borders, of narratives designed to serve the few. The colors scream with conflict, yet they hold an uneasy structure.

Four Points No. 2 begins to waver. The lines that once defined order blur into something softer, something more uncertain. The younger generation watches as the old foundations crack, the promises of leadership faltering in the face of a world unraveling. Misinformation thrives, and the four points no longer align.

Four Points No. 3 is subdued, drained. The structure remains, but it has faded into neutrality, stripped of conviction. The lines still exist, but their power has dissolved. The question lingers—have we reached a point of no return, or is there still time to redraw the boundaries of truth?